dimanche 14 décembre 2025

The End of Economic Science: Mathematics

 

This book is not yet another treatise on economics. It is a demonstration that modern "scientific" economics is dead because it was built on an ontological lie: it wanted to measure man with tools that ignore infinity, circularity, and the constitutive duality of being. Everything is spiritual... up to—and especially—mathematics. Take the simple diagonal of a square with sides of one meter: its length is √2. Impossible to give an exact fraction of it. This irrationality shows us that human measurement stumbles upon infinity. Reality always exceeds calculation.

Everything starts from a mathematical observation as simple as it is irrefutable: √2 is irrational, π is transcendent, the circle never closes perfectly in the world of fractions. In other words: as soon as we measure reality, we already touch infinity. Yet classical economics claimed to do exactly the opposite: to enclose human infinity in finite curves, rates, GDP, marginal utilities. It replaced the circle with the straight line, the cycle with the arrow, the return to the One with "infinite growth." Result: a science that works as long as we remain in the small rational world... and that collapses as soon as we touch the living.

My work shows that numbers themselves are spiritual hieroglyphs:

In the 9th century, Al-Khwārizmī invents algebra and opens the way to zero. The Arabic word sifr which gave the word cipher, means "empty," but it also comes from sefer: the book. Zero is not absence, it is the Sefer, the closed book, the creative emptiness (Shunyata, Ensō, Ain Soph) that allows the ONE. The individual, the INDIVI DUAL, the one who cannot be divided into TWO, the one who makes ONE, the Tawhid in Islam, the hero among the ancient Greeks who has reached the end of his quest.

The dyad (the 2) is not a quantity, it is the ontological state of man: "you are gods" = "you are Two" as written in Psalm 82:6 taken up by Jesus in John 10:34. In Hebrew: אֲנִי־אָמַרְתִּי אֱלֹהִים אַתֶּם → "I have said: you are gods (elohim)." But in Aramaic (the language Jesus spoke), the same word "gods" can be heard as תְּרֵין / treyn or תַּרְתֵּין / tartên, which literally means "two" (duality).

And yet, when this dyad accepts its own tension and is squared, it falls back exactly on the One: cos²θ + sin²θ = 1. Euler only rediscovered 2,200 years later what Pythagoras already knew in the temple: the reconciliation of opposites leads back to Unity.

Current economics is therefore the pathology of a world that has forgotten this circular truth:

it adds without ever closing the loop, it accumulates without return, it separates the masculine and the feminine, labor and capital, earth and man,

Current economics believes that 2 + 2 = 4. It is linear and additive logic: You have two units of labor → you add two more → you get four. You have two euros → you add two → you have four euros. You have two resources → you add two → you have four resources. Principle: the more you add, the more you possess. It is the arrow of economic time: infinite growth on a straight line, endless accumulation, GDP that must always rise.

In the real circle, we have cos²x + sin²x = 1. It is circular and harmonic logic. Take two opposite numbers whose sum of squares equals 1 (for example cos θ = √2/2 ≈ 0.707 and sin θ = √2/2 ≈ 0.707): (√2/2)² + (√2/2)² = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1. You have two equal quantities (two complementary "halves"). You square them (putting them in tension, in relation, at work) and you fall back exactly on Unity, on the Whole. In other words: when the two poles (labor/capital, man/woman, giving/receiving, north/south, etc.) agree to enter into a squared relationship (that is to say in perfect balance, in justice, in true reciprocity), they do not make 4 (2²)... they make 1. They reconstitute the circle. They return to Unity instead of adding up infinitely. This is the meaning of Psalm 82:6 taken up by Jesus in John 10:34 and therefore:

You are "gods" but mortal, in the sense that we possess a creative power, the miltha. But also: you are "two," and we must make ONE (Tawhid). The Gospel according to Thomas discovered in 1945, one of the 52 manuscripts discovered in Egypt at Nag Hammadi in Egypt, is a collection of 114 logia, the words attributed to Jesus. Logion 106 explains: "When you see the One in the two, you will be Son of man and if you tell the mountain to move away, it will move away." Logion 39 gives us the keys to understanding: "The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered and have prevented those who wanted to. As for you, be wise as serpents and pure as doves."

The Golden Age that is beginning is not a utopia: it is the moment when humanity reintegrates sacred geometry into its exchanges. A circular, fraternal economy, based on gift and return, on the cycle and not on predation, on the ONE that contains the TWO rather than on the 2 that denies the One.

In conclusion, economic science dies the day we understand that the most beautiful equation in the world, e^(iπ) + 1 = 0, is not just another theorem... it is God's very signature on reality, and the promise that everything that has been separated will end up returning to the One. Euler's equation brings together the five fundamentals of all reality: 0, 1, π, Euler's number e, and the imaginary unit i. It is the alliance of the finite and the infinite, of the real and the imaginary, of the circle and the exponential. It shows that opposites do not destroy each other: they are reconciled in the One. The end of economic science is not a crisis. It is the birth of the Golden Age: one where we no longer count to possess, but to share, where we count to make TWO and find the ONE again.

PS: This book is written in the language of the birds—that language that mystics of all traditions have practiced, where words are not arbitrary signs, but resonances of reality. When Jesus says 'you are elohim', and the Gospel of Thomas reveals 'you must see the One in the two', it is not a linguistic coincidence: it is the same truth vibrating in two formulations. Elohim and treyn (two) are not 'etymologically linked'—they are phonetically twins in the Aramaic space, and it is precisely this that Jesus, speaking in Aramaic, could make his disciples hear. Transmission was always oral before being written; sound precedes the letter. This method is not 'less rigorous' than philology: it is rigorous in another way, because it listens to the breath (ruach, pneuma) before the dead letter.


Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire