IRAN ATTACK: THE SECRETS REVEALED

 

As the world keeps its eyes fixed on the military escalation between the Trump administration and Tehran, one hypothesis must be deciphered: what if the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque were not the final objective, but the catalyst for a programmed decomposition of the Muslim world?

This article proposes a structured reading according to milthasophy and PARDES (PRDS), the PaRaDiS in Persian — Peshat, Remez, Derash, Sod — an ancestral hermeneutic tool that allows one to traverse the four levels of reality of a single event, from the most visible to the deepest. Saint Thomas Aquinas had, long ago, introduced the four levels of reading as the basis of scholasticism, illustrated by the famous formula: “Littera gesta docet, quid credas allegoria, Moralis quid agas, quo tendas anagogia,” which means “The letter teaches the facts, allegory what you must believe, the moral what you must do, anagogy where you must tend.” In my book I deepen this point, which has been erased from Christian memory.

 

PESHAT — THE SURFACE: TRUMP AGAINST IRAN

 

At the level of Peshat — the literal meaning, what everyone sees — the situation is clear: the Trump administration has engaged in an open confrontation with Tehran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Official statements, sanctions, military movements in the Gulf — everything converges toward this stated objective.

This is the dominant narrative. The one relayed by mainstream media, the one defended by Western chancelleries. It is not false — it is incomplete.

 

REMEZ — THE ALLUSION: THE AMERICAN IMPLOSION

 

Remez — the allusive level — invites us to read between the lines. The United States stands on the brink of a financial and social implosion unprecedented since the Great Depression. Public debt exceeds 35 trillion dollars, social cohesion is fractured, and the credibility of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency is being challenged. More than 9 trillion dollars in Treasury bonds must be issued this year, which will be impossible.

In this context, a war in the Middle East is not merely geopolitical — it is economic. Destabilizing Iran, securing oil routes, and positioning the United States as the world’s leading producer of oil and gas is an attempt to burn the table in order to save the cards. External chaos as an outlet for internal implosion: this is a strategy as old as empires, and it will fail, dragging humanity into an unprecedented financial chaos and a war of all against all.

 

DERASH — THE INTERPRETATION: DIVIDE TO SAVE

 

Derash — the interpretative level — reveals a deeper strategic logic: fracturing the Muslim world in order to save Israel. The method is not new — it has a documented precedent.

On February 22, 2006, an explosion devastated the golden dome of the Al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, Iraq. The attack, never fully clarified, instantly fractured Iraqi national unity and precipitated a Sunni-Shiite civil war. To strike Al-Askari was to target the heart of Shiite eschatology — the mausoleum of the 11th Imam, Al-Hasan al-Askari, father of the awaited Mahdi.

Twenty years later, the same mechanism could be applied on an incomparably larger scale. If Iran were designated responsible for the destruction of Al-Aqsa in the chaos of an open war — whether through real or fabricated attribution — the Sunni-Shiite fracture would ignite on a global scale. It would mean turning the Muslim world against itself at the precise moment when solidarity around Al-Aqsa would be expected.

 

SOD — THE SECRET: THE ESCHATOLOGICAL FINALITY

 

Sod — the level of the secret, of mystery — reveals the ultimate purpose: the true target is Al-Aqsa, and the objective is the reconstruction of the Third Temple. It is here that the gematric logic of millenarian actors comes into play — not as a tool of the analyst, but as a documented system of thought of those who plan within this perspective.

Institutions such as the Temple Institute in Jerusalem — whose members have public ties with the current Israeli governmental coalition — operate within a theological framework in which dates and numbers have direct prophetic significance. Gematria, the Hebrew discipline of the numerical reduction of words, is their operative language.

 

Five verifiable convergences emerge:

 

1. The Samarra attack took place on February 22 — that is 11+11 in gematria, the number of completed duality.
2. The target was the mausoleum of the 11th Shiite Imam, Al-Hasan al-Askari.
3. In gematria, Al-Aqsa = 7 (223 → 2+2+3) and Al-Askari = 4 (391 → 13 → 4). Thus 7+4 = 11, the numerical signature common to both holy sites.
4. The sum of the digits of 02/28/2026 — the symbolic date of this escalation — gives 2+8+0+2+2+0+2+6 = 22, that is 11+11. The same signature as Samarra.
5. According to the Iranian Shiite calendar — in which Ramadan 2026 begins on February 17 — February 28 corresponds to the 11th day of Ramadan. The target is Shiite; it is therefore logically the Iranian Shiite calendar that applies. March 11, 2026 is the second key date because it corresponds to 22 Adar 5786, again an 11 and a 22 (11 + 11). Even more striking, Adar in gematria has the numerical value 205 and 205 + 11 = 216, that is 6x6x6, the famous 666 whose GREAT secret I reveal in my book. For those who have doubts I remind you that the First World War ended on 11-11-1918 at 11 o’clock and that the Atocha station attack in Spain took place on 11-03-2004, that is 1+1+3+2+4 = 11!!!

 

 

It is not the analyst who reads these codes: it is the actors themselves who operate within this logic, documented in their theological literature. The Temple Institute has in fact made public complete architectural plans of the future Temple, as well as the training of priestly cohorts — an active preparation, not a symbolic one.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS AS THE ONLY SHIELD

 

Traversing these four levels — from Peshat to Sod — is not an academic exercise. It is recognizing that the same event can simultaneously be a military operation, a financial maneuver, a strategy of division, and the fulfillment of an eschatological vision. These levels do not exclude one another: they overlap.

The history of Samarra has taught us that confusion over the attribution of an attack can be more devastating than the attack itself. In a context of maximum crisis, the first question to ask is not “who struck?” but “who benefits from the chaos that follows?”

The best protection against this type of operation is not military. It is epistemological: knowing how to read the four levels of an event before emotion closes off the possibility of thinking. PRDS is not merely an ancient hermeneutic tool — in this context, it is an act of intellectual resistance.